A Yissachar / Zebulun Partnership in Loving Memory of Yishak ben Simcha A"H & Felicia bat Miriam A"H
Rabbi Eli Mansour

Daf Yomi

Taanit 31A (12th Cycle Daf Yomi Shiur)

Lectured by Rabbi Eli Mansour

Published
January 14, 2006
Duration
60:01

This transcript was auto-generated and polished for readability. While we aim for accuracy, errors may occur. If you notice a mistake, please click to submit corrections.

The Talmud describes a unique social custom involving the borrowing of dresses, designed to prevent embarrassment. In this hierarchy, the daughter of the king, or princess, would borrow her dress from a lady one notch beneath her: the daughter of the Kohen Gadol, the High Priest. The daughter of the Kohen Gadol, in turn, would borrow from the daughter of the Sagan. The Sagan is the viceroy, serving as the second priest, prepared to assume the High Priest's role should the first become disqualified from service. Next in line, the daughter of the Sagan would borrow from the daughter of the Kohen Meshua Milchamah, the priest anointed for war who would address the Jewish people before battle, offering encouragement. The daughter of the Kohen Meshua Milchamah would then borrow from a regular priest, one who wears the four designated garments. This chain continued, with all Jewish people borrowing from one another, ensuring that no lady who lacked a suitable dress would be shamed.

The Gemara further explains a ruling concerning these borrowed garments: all dresses and vessels that are borrowed must be immersed in a ritual bath, even if they are new or still folded in their original box. The initial reason for this requirement is the possibility that the lending woman might be in a state of ritual impurity. However, one might ask why only the dresses borrowed from a ritually impure woman are not immersed. The answer lies in the principle of avoiding embarrassment. To single out a borrower's dress for immersion would publicly indicate that the lender was ritually impure, causing her shame. Therefore, the ruling dictates that all borrowed dresses, regardless of their condition or the lender's status, must undergo immersion, thereby preserving everyone's dignity.

The Gemara then shifts to a narrative about Jewish girls who would gather in vineyards, forming a circle. Men who sought a wife would go there to choose a partner. The Gemara elaborates on the enticements the girls would offer to attract prospective husbands, categorizing them by their primary attributes. Girls endowed with beauty would emphasize their physical attractiveness, stating that beauty itself was their primary advantage. Those from good lineage would highlight their family background, explaining that a wife's main purpose is to bear children. The benefit of good lineage, they argued, was that their children would also possess distinguished ancestry, making it easier to arrange their marriages as everyone desires connection to a reputable family. Furthermore, the Gemara notes elsewhere that children often resemble their mother's brothers; thus, a good family background would positively influence the sons, who would inherit traits from the mother's side.

The uncomely or less attractive women, knowing they could not appeal based on beauty or family, would offer a different proposition. They would say, "Take your wife, so long as you adorn me with gold," meaning, "so long as you provide me with jewelry." While this might seem like a simple request for clothes after marriage, commentators explain its deeper meaning. They suggest that by providing fine clothes and jewelry, even an uncomely woman could be made to appear beautiful. The Ben Ish Chai offers an additional interpretation: he suggests that these women were addressing men who might be stingy, desiring to marry an uncomely woman precisely because they believed they wouldn't need to spend much money on her, unlike a beautiful woman who might require expensive upkeep. The uncomely women, therefore, were asserting that even if chosen for such reasons, they still expected to be supplied with proper jewelry and adornments.

It is also pointed out that the Gemara uses various names for a wife, one of which is "house." A woman is called "house," as in the expression "mistress of the house." The simple explanation for this appellation is that she attends to the needs of the home. However, based on this Gemara, a deeper understanding emerges: the word "house" (Bayit) can be seen as an acronym, where the letters represent children (Banim), beauty (Yofi), and adornments (Takhshitim). This implies that a wife encompasses all these aspects.

Rabbi Uda Bira'a, from the city of Bira'a, taught that in the future, the Holy One, Blessed be He, will orchestrate a circular dance for the righteous in the Gana'a Eid, the Garden of Eden. God Himself will be at the center of this circle. Everyone will point with their finger, exclaiming, "This is the One we anticipated, and He brings us salvation! This is the One we awaited, and now we will rejoice and be happy in His salvation!" Commentators, including the Gaon Mevilna, explain the profound significance of this circular dance. The righteous individuals participating will come from diverse communities, representing all segments of the Jewish people. This includes various groups among the Ashkenazim, such as Germans, Lithuanians, and Poles, as well as different sects among the Sephardim, such as Moroccans, those from Aram Soba, and Yemenites from Teman. Each community will contribute its righteous individuals to this dance.

The reason for the circular formation, with the Holy One, Blessed be He, in the center, is that in a circle, every point is equidistant from the center. This symbolizes that no righteous individual will be closer to God than another. The profound message is that every community, through its unique customs that have foundations rooted in holiness, is capable of reaching the Holy One, Blessed be He, with the same proximity and closeness as any other. No one should mistakenly believe that their customs are exclusively correct to the exclusion of another community. Instead, everyone will recognize that their distinct ways—their dress, speech, foods, and traditions—have brought them to the exact same point of proximity to God as the person standing next to them, who may have different clothes, a different pronunciation, and different customs. This is the essence of the circular dance with God at its center: it affirms that all who faithfully follow their customs are equally close to God.

Hadran alaak b'shoshat perakim b'shlich ha'ara b'seche ta'anit