iTorah

Loading, Please Wait...

v3.3.0
A Yissachar / Zebulun Partnership in Loving Memory of Yishak ben Simcha A"H & Felicia bat Miriam A"H
Rabbi Eli Mansour

Daf Yomi

Shabbat 26A - 26B (Iyun Shiur)

Lectured by Rabbi Eli Mansour

Published
August 7, 2008
Duration
55:24

This transcript was auto-generated and polished for readability. While we aim for accuracy, errors may occur. If you notice a mistake, please click to submit corrections.

In our study today, we delve into a critical examination of a passage from Daf Kaf Hey, specifically Kaf Hey Amud Beis, which discusses the obligation of Neiros Shabbos. This topic is familiar to us all, yet it carries significant halachic implications. The Gemara states, "Amar Lei she'ani omer hadlakas ner b'shabbos chovah," indicating that the lighting of the candle for Shabbos is considered a mandatory obligation, or chovah, as articulated by Rava.

Furthermore, the Gemara continues with the assertion from Rav Nachman bar Zavda and others that while the lighting of the ner for Shabbos is chovah, the washing of hands and legs with hot water is merely rishus, or optional. This distinction is crucial, as it highlights the varying levels of obligation within our rituals. The Tosafot elaborates on the term chovah, suggesting that it is relative. For instance, washing hands is deemed chovah in comparison to the less obligatory act of washing hands with hot water, which does not carry the same weight.

Moreover, the Tosafot explains that mayim acharonim—the final washing of hands—is also considered chovah due to the potential danger associated with salt on one's fingers, as recounted in a story from the Gemara where neglecting this washing led to a tragic outcome. Thus, the severity of mayim acharonim is underscored, and we see that different acts of washing carry distinct halachic statuses.

As we explore the implications of chovah, we encounter a debate among the Rishonim. Some assert that there is no blessing, or beracha, recited over obligations categorized as chovah. This is akin to the ruling about mayim acharonim, where a blessing is not required. Therefore, the argument posits that since the lighting of Neiros Shabbos is classified as chovah, a blessing should not be recited.

Conversely, others contend that the lighting of Neiros Shabbos is indeed a mitzvah, and blessings are appropriate for mitzvot. This brings us to a nuanced distinction between chovah and mitzvah, where the former is seen as an obligation that does not warrant a blessing, while the latter does. This distinction is significant and warrants careful consideration.

Furthermore, the Gemara introduces a practical scenario: if a candle was lit before Shabbos, one does not need to extinguish and relight it. This leads some to argue that the obligation to light is not as stringent as once thought, reinforcing the idea that merely having light is sufficient for fulfilling the obligation of Neiros Shabbos.

However, the Tosafot counters this argument by drawing parallels to other mitzvot that can be fulfilled without direct action on the part of the individual. For example, the act of covering blood, or kissuy hadam, can be done by external forces, yet one still makes a blessing when performing the act. This suggests that the presence of an obligation does not negate the need for a blessing.

In the discourse surrounding Neiros Shabbos, Rabbeinu Tam introduces a critical point, indicating that if the candle was already lit, one must relight it to fulfill the mitzvah. This perspective emphasizes the importance of intention and the active role one plays in fulfilling the mitzvah of lighting.

In contrast, Rabbeinu Meshullam posits that the mitzvah is not complete until one actively engages in the lighting process. This distinction leads to a broader discussion on the nature of obligation and the conditions under which blessings should be recited.

As we navigate these complex discussions, we also turn to the Rambam, who articulates that the lighting of Neiros Shabbos is not merely optional; rather, it is a requirement that applies to both men and women. The Rambam asserts that the primary goal is to have a candle lit in the home, reinforcing the idea that the essence of the mitzvah is the presence of light.

In conclusion, the dialogue surrounding the obligation of Neiros Shabbos is rich with halachic implications and varying interpretations among the Rishonim. The distinctions made between chovah and mitzvah, the necessity of intention, and the conditions under which blessings are recited all contribute to our understanding of this fundamental practice. As we continue our studies, we must remain vigilant in recognizing the nuances that define our obligations and the blessings that accompany them.