A Yissachar / Zebulun Partnership in Loving Memory of Yishak ben Simcha A"H & Felicia bat Miriam A"H
Rabbi Eli Mansour

Parasha Insight

Shabbat Morning Class - Parasha Teruma

Lectured by Rabbi Eli Mansour

Published
April 16, 2010
Duration
02:0*
Rabbi Mansour 2010 Shabbat Morning Class ืคืจืฉื” ืชืจื•ืžื” ื•ื™ืงื—ื• ืœื™ ืชืจื•ืžื”" " - "Take for me a portion" The Jewish people were exhorted to contribute towards the construction of the Mishkan. Rashi explains ืœื™ -for me, to mean ืœืฉืžื™ - for my name sake. There are many different explanations as to what Rashi was teaching us with this word ืœืฉืžื™ (it is amazing to see so many different understandings of just a single word of the holy Rashi, and Rashi most definitely meant every one of them! Every single word and letter in our holy Torah is "bursting" with countless wondrous interpretations!) One interpretation is that Rashi is referring to money in general (since the Pasuk is discussing distributing funds towards the Mishkan). Money in its own right is very dangerous. It can change peoples lives in a negative way, and it changes the way people act. Money can destroy a life if used improperly. As a matter of fact, the word "dollar" ( 240 =ื“ื•ืœืจ ) has the same numerical value as Amalek ( 240 =ืขืžืœืง )!! However if it is used properly ืœืฉื ืฉืžื™ื - for Hashemโ€™s sake then it is elevated ืชืจื•ืžื” ืžืœืฉื•ืŸ ืชืจื•ื) ). Money becomes a tool to do Chesed, charity and many other virtuous acts. Rashi is teaching us this lesson, that when is money elevated ( ?(ืชืจื•ืžื” When its ืœื™ -ืœืฉืžื™ when it is used ืœืฉื ืฉืžื™ื , only then are the dangers of money lifted. This explains why the Pasuk says "' ืœื™ ื”ื›ืกืฃ ื•ืœื™ ื”ื–ื”ื‘ ื ืื ื” "- "to me is gold, and to me is silver says Hashem". What is the meaning of this? Could it be that Hashem takes pride in gold and silver?! We now understand that the word ืœื™ refers to ืœืฉืžื™ for ืœืฉื ืฉืžื™ื . So the Pasuk is saying; when is gold and silver of value? Only when its ืœื™ , when used ืœืฉื ืฉืžื™ื , for the purpose of a Misvah. This also explains what it says about Tsadikim " ื—ื‘ื™ื‘ ืขืœื™ื”ื ืžืžื•ื ื ื™ื•ืชืจ ืžื’ื•ืคื "- "their money is more dear to them than their lives", how can this be? This seems like eschewed priorities?! Now we understand that since the Tsadikim only spend their money ืœืฉื ืฉืžื™ื to save lives, to support Yeshivas etcโ€ฆthese are acts that the body alone cannot accomplish. We cannot build a Yeshivah or help feed the poor with only our body, we need money to facilitate these acts. So in this respect their money is more precious to them than their bodies, because only with money can they accomplish these acts of Hesed. Another understanding of ืœื™ ืœืฉืžื™ is that Rashi is referring literally to Hashemโ€™s name when he says ืœืฉืžื™ . Meaning, the Pasuk is warning the Jews to give charity for the sake of my name, that it should not be erased by the water of Sotah. (Sotah is an unfaithful wife who after being warned, secludes herself with another man. She is then brought to the temple and must undergo a procedure administered by the Kohen that includes drinking water in which a parchment with the name of Hashem was dipped in. This procedure caused the name of Hashem to be erased in the water). How would this happen? The Kohen usually had to approach the people in order to collect the ืชืจื•ืžื•ืช ื•ืžืขืฉืจื•ืช (the portions and tithes) that are due to them. Many times people would avoid the Kohen, so as not to be forced to give them their due portions. It is written that the reason the Parasha of Sotah is found next to the Parasha of Terumah and Maaser is because those that avoid the Kohen so as not to give him his portion, will ultimately need the Kohen and seek him out, in order to administer the Sotah proceedings for his wife. The Pasuk is saying; give charity (the portions that are due to the Kohen are called charity) do not avoid him! ืœื™-ืœืฉืžื™ for my name sake, that it shouldnโ€™t be erased with the Sotah water, that you would need to give to your wife since you avoided the Kohen! Why does this happen? Why when man avoids giving charity does he end up needing to bring his wife to the temple in suspicion of her being unfaithful?? It is written that Hashem asks us to give 10% of our earnings to him (to charity). This is very generous of him! If Hashem wanted he could have said I will keep 90% (that we must give 90% to charity) and you could have 10%. After all, anything we make comes only from Hashem. However if a person refrains from giving his portion, Hashem indeed takes the 90% and leaves the person with 10%. "(Like the well known story in the Gemarah of a wealthy man who used to give charity from his fields, after he passed on his children decided that the father had given too much charity and decreased it. At the end of the year they had found that the field produced 10% less than the previous year. The children decided that now, since the field had produced less they had to give even less charity, etc. Every year till eventually the fields produced only a tenth of what it used to produce and Hashem had "taken" the other ninety percent!). This is one way that a man loses his money. There is however another way. When a man goes after his desires with women, it says " ืจื•ืขื” ื–ื•ื ื•ืช ื™ืื‘ื“ ื”ื•ืŸ " "he will lose a fortune" ื‘ืขื“ ืืฉื” ื–ื•ื ื” ืขื“ ื›ื›ืจ ืœื—ื - until he is a pauper that begs for bread. The wife of a man that loses his money (because he does not give charity) thinks the reason her husband is losing his money is because he is not being faithful. So she in turns tries to "copy" him and she becomes a Sotah. She does not realize that the reason he is losing his money is because he is not giving charity. With this we can understand why a man who avoids giving charity by avoiding the Kohen ends up in need of the Kohen for his wife who will be a Sotah. Another understanding of ืœื™ ืœืฉืžื™ is from the Baal Shem Tov, who explains that when a person does a Misvah he is supposed to do it ืœืฉืžื” - to have in mind the reason why he is doing it or at least have in mind that the act he is doing is a Misvah. There is one exception and that is the Misvah of giving charity. Even if a person does not give charity ืœืฉืžื” , ultimately the poor person still benefits from his money and is revived. Even if a person lost money in the street and a poor man finds it, the one who lost it still gets the Misvah. As it says in Tehilim " ืคื–ืจ ."ืคื–ืจ ื ืชืŸ ืœืื‘ื™ื•ื ื™ื - means to distribute or disperse (implying without intention ), whereas ื ืชืŸ - means to give with intention. Even if a person was " ืคื–ืจ " his money (gave it without intention) ื ืชืŸ -it is as if he gave it with the proper intent. The Pasuk also says ื–ืจืขื• ืœื›ื ืฆื“ืงื” - plant for yourself charity, meaning just like a seed needs no "intentions" to grow when placed in the ground so too charity as long as it gets "from point a to point b" the giver gets rewarded. However even in the act of charity the receiver must be ืœืฉื ืฉืžื™ื -meaning, he must be careful only to accept what he needs to live. ื•ื™ืงื—ื• ืœื™- ืœืฉืžื™ the word ื•ื™ืงื—ื• means to take. Seemingly the Torah should have written ื•ื™ืชื ื• ืœื™ give for my sake, why does it say take? Since the Torah is instructing the receiver- ืœื™ ืœืฉืžื™ - to be ืœืฉืžื” in his accepting charity. Another understanding of ืœื™ ืœืฉืžื™ is that in the Beit Hamikdash (and Mishkan) they would pronounce Hashemโ€™s name as spelled (whereas today we do not pronounce it as spelled ื™-ื”-ื•-ื” , we pronounce it ืœื™ ืœืฉืžื™ .(ืื“ -ื ื™ - give the charity to build the Mishkan for the sake of my name, meaning, in order that my name should be said - which can only be done after the Mishkan is built. Another understanding of ืœื™ ืœืฉืžื™ is that it says in the Gemarah, one who gives charity should not give more than 20% of his money. One is obligated to give 10% but should not give more than 20%. We see this from Yaakov Avinu that said ืขืฉืจ ืืขืฉืจื ื• I will give 10% twice (20%). By Avraham Avinu it says ื•ื™ืชืŸ ืœื• ืžืขืฉืจ ืžื›ืœ that he gave 10%. This is hinted to in the word ืฆื“ืงื” , the first and third letters are ืฆ -ืง which are 90- 100. This signifies giving the obligatory 10% (90 out of 100), the second and fourth letters are ื“-ื” which are 4-5 this signifies giving 20% (four out of five) to charity. It also says about giving charity that one who gives charity is blessed with six blessings. Even greater is one that speaks words of encouragement to the poor man, he is blessed with eleven blessings (this is hinted in the Hagadah of Pesah that says ,ื”ื ืœื—ืžื ืขื ื™ื literally; this the bread of affliction. ื”ื - the six blessings [ ื”ื is numerically 6]- go to- ืœื—ืžื -one who gives bread to the poor man.). ืขื  -ื™ื - but if one speaks to the poor man ( ืขื - ืžืœืฉื•ืŸ ื•ืขื ื™ืช ื•ืืžืจืช ), he gets 11 blessings ( ื™ื equals 11). These concepts are hinted in the name of Hashem. The ื™ื•ื“ stands for the 10 percent one is obligated to give to charity, the ' ื” stands for the 20% (one fifth) maximum one can give. The ' ื• stands for the six blessings that one receives when he gives charity and the final ' ื” stands for the additional 5 blessings totaling 11 that one receives for speaking kind words to a poor man. ืœื™ ืœืฉืžื™ give for my name, Rashi is hinting to all the concepts of Tsedakah that are represented in the name of Hashem. Another understanding in ืœื™ ืœืฉืžื™ is that in the Beit Hamikdash on Yom Kippur the Kohen Gadol used to say the 72 letter name of Hashem in his prayer (this is the name of ื™'ืฉื• used to perform his "magic" after he heard it from the Kohen Gadol, after this happened the Kohen Gadol started to say this name in a whisper).The Talmud Yerushalmi says that one who knows of this 72 letter name must not benefit from others, since he may misuse the powers of this name for the wrong reasons. (Meaning, if he normally accepts charity from someone and one time the person cannot give him, he may come to improperly use this 72 letter name to harm the person) Thatโ€™s why it says ื•ื™ื‘ื˜ื—ื• ื‘ืš ื™ื•ื“ืขื™ ืฉืžืš - lit; those that know your name rely on you. ื•ื™ื‘ื˜ื—ื• ื‘ืš - they rely only on you and not on peopleโ€™s charity. ื™ื•ื“ืขื™ ืฉืžืš - those that know your 72 letter name. The question is, that the Kohen Gadol would say this name and he had to collect ืชืจื•ืžื•ืช -charity from the people. How could he have learned the 72 letter name if he accepts charity? If he accepts it as a messenger- a ืฉืœื™ื— โ€“ of Hashem then it is ok, as it says ื•ื™ืงื—ื• ืœื™ Hashem says to the Kohen; take for me, ืœืฉืžื™ -for my name, so that you will be able to learn my 72 letter name. The merit of this 72 letter name was invoked by Queen Esther in the story of Purim, when she decreed a 3 day fast for the Jewish people; 3 days have 72 hours, corresponding to the 72 letter name. The Pasuk in the Megillah says -ื•ื‘ื›ืŸ ืื‘ื•ื ืืœ ื”ืžืœืš "with this I will approach the king". ื•ื‘ื›ืŸ -"with this"- is numerically 72, with the merit of the 72 letter name and the 72 hour fast of the people I will approach the king to save us. Esther herself did not fast the complete 72 hours since she could not approach the king weak and famished. Therefore she ate 2 hours before she was due to approach the king and fasted 70 hours total. This is hinted to in the Pasuk โ€“ื•ืื ื™ ื•ื ืขืจืชื™ ืืฆื•ื ื›ืŸ "myself and my maids will fast as well". The word ื›ืŸ is numerically 70, alluding to the 70 hours that Esther herself had fasted. We also allude to this 72 letter name in the Amidah of Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur, when we say many times the word ื•ื‘ื›ืŸ -the word ื‘ื›ืŸ is 72, we are asking Hashem to answer us in the merit of this 72 letter name. Another understanding in ืœื™ ืœืฉืžื™ is that when we gives Sedakah we are "acting out" the letters of Hashemโ€™s name. The ื™ื•ื“ is for the coin (or cash), the ' ื” is for the hand of the giver (' ื” is numerically 5 for the 5 fingers of the hand). The ' ื• is for the extended arm of the giver and the ' ื” is for the hand of the receiver. Thus we find the act of giving charity unifies the letters of Hashemโ€™s name ื™-ื” -ื• -ื” . The Pasuk says Give Sedakah ืœื™ ,ืœื™ ืœืฉืžื™ -stands for ืœืฉื ื™ื—ื•ื“ - for the sake of uniting, ืœืฉืžื™ - the letters of the name of Hashem. How is one supposed to make this unification in the proper if, instead of initially approaching the poor man, the poor man initially approaches him? In that case the hand of the receiver is extended first, this represents the ' ื” of Hashemโ€™s name coming before the rest of the letters. This is like the letters of Hashemโ€™s name out of order?!). One way is to first give the man a little, than to call him back and give him again. The second time you give you will be the one taking the initiative and extending your hand first to the poor man. This is why the Pasuk says ืคืชื— ืชืคืชื— a double expression of giving Sedakah, to show us that by giving the second time we form Hashemโ€™s name in the proper order (simply understood the Pasuk uses a double expression for giving charity because a person usually needs extra prodding to take money out of his pocket to give it to charity). Another way to form the letters of Hashemโ€™s name in the proper order when approached by someone is to make the unification "with yourself" meaning to hand yourself the money from the right hand to the left hand. The left hand "acts" as the final ื”' in Hashemโ€™s name. After you do this and "spell out" the name of Hashem you give the money to the ืขื ื™ . This method should also be employed when giving money to a woman. It is not proper for a man to directly hand money into the palm of a woman, lest it lead to improper thought. The Pasuk says ื™ื“ ืœื™ื“ ืœื ื™ื ืงื” the Gemarah explains; if a person intentionally approaches a woman -just too merely glance at her hand- he will not be spared from Gehinom for that act. This is illustrated is a story with Rโ€™ Meir from Parmishlan, who was once about to give charity to a woman and before he did so, he started to pass the money form one hand to the next. His students asked him, what are you doing? He explained that he was making the ื™ื—ื•ื“ -unification of Hashemโ€™s name with himself as this is the proper way of giving Sedakah to a woman. This is why the Pasuk says ืžืืช ื›ืœ ืื™ืฉ ืืฉืจ ื™ื“ื‘ื ื• ืœื‘ื• "from every man whose heart induces him to give, take" Why does the Pasuk specify a man? The woman gave as well! They gave even more than the men!? The Torah was teaching that the unification accomplished by directly giving Sedakah should be done with a man, but regarding a woman it is improper to directly take or give charity. This explains the Gemarah that says: " ; "ื›ืœ ืžื™ ืฉื™ืฉ ืœื• ืขืกืง ืขื ื ืฉื™ื ืœื ื™ืชื™ื—ื“ ืขืž ื”ื "anyone that has dealings with women should not seclude himself with them". Simply understood, this means that whoever has a business that entails dealings with women should be careful not to be secluded with them. The question could be asked; why is the Gemarah specifying someone that deals with women should not be secluded with them, no one - no matter who they are may be secluded with women!? The Gemarah was really referring to this unification when giving charity and should be understood as follows; anyone that has dealings ( ืขืกืง ) of charity with women, should not do the unification ( ื™ื—ื•ื“ ) with them- ืœื ื™ืชื™ื—ื“ ืขืžื”ื - because it is improper. This concept of forming the letters of the name of Hashem is also seen in marriage. A man gives a coin to a woman and pronounces -ื”ืจื™ ืืช ืžืงื•ื“ืฉืช ืœื™ ื‘ื˜ื‘ืขืช ื–ื• you are betrothed to me with this coin". The coin is the ' ื™, the hand of the ื—ืชืŸ is the ' ,ื” his arm is the ' ื•, and the hand of the ื›ืœื” is the final ' ืœื™ -ืžืงื•ื“ืฉืช ืœื™ .ื” is like the ืœื™ ืœืฉืžื™ of giving charity, an act that forms the name of Hashem. This is another way of explaining what is says ืื™ืฉ ื•ืืฉื” ืฉื›ื™ื ื” ืฉืจื•ื™ื” ื‘ื™ื ื™ื”ื - "a man and woman has the ืฉื›ื™ื ื” with them", with the act of their marriage they "bring down" the ืฉื›ื™ื ื” to dwell with them by forming the name of Hashem. There is also another ื›ื•ื ื” (intention) one should have when giving charity and that is for the name of Hashem of ื”ื•ื™ื” in the manner that it numerically totals 40. This is thru the letter ' ื” that is formed either as a ' ื“ and ' ื• or as ' ื™ and ' ื“, (when a Sofer writes the letter ื” he can either form the letter by writing a ื“ with a ื• "inside" or with a ื“ with a ื™ "inside", either way is kosher) . The numerical value of ื“- ื™ is 14 and numerical value of ื“- ื• is 10. If we form one of the two ' ื”s in Hashemโ€™s name as ื“ -ื™ and one of them as ื“ -ื• (since they are both valid methods to form a ื”) the numerical value of Hashemโ€™s name becomes 40. ื”' ื•' ื”' ื™' 10 +14+ 6+ 10 =40 This is why on the night of Pesach we break the Matzah into two pieces, one the shape of the ื“', and one the shape of the ื•'. The Arizal says the Matzah is compared to a ' ื” as it says ื”ื) ื”ื ืœื—ืžื” ืขื ื™ื spells the letter ' ื”) we brake it into the two letters that form a ื”' - the letter ' ื“ and ' .ื• This is hinted to in the Pasuk in ืฉื™ืจ ื”ืฉื™ืจื™ื that says ืื ื™ ืœื“ื•ื“ื™ ื•ื“ื•ื“ื™ ืœื™ - "I am to my beloved and my beloved is to me". The word ื“ื•ื“ื™ is ื“ื•-ื“ื™ , - the two different ways of forming the letter ' ื”. This totals 40, which is the numerical value of the word ื“ื•ื“ื™ -ืœื™ .ืœื™ when we spell the name of Hashem with the 2 ' ื”โ€™s formed in the 2 different ways, we have a numerical value that totals 40- .ืœื™ With the words ืœื™ ืœืฉืžื™ โ€“ Rashi is hinting that the name of Hashem, in the method that it equals -40 ืœื™ - is the one that we should have in mind when giving charity. There is another understanding in ืœื™ ืœืฉืžื™ . The Parasha describes later on ( ืคืจืง ื›ื•' ืคืกื•ืง ื' ) some of the items that were crafted from the donations of the people, such as the ื™ืจืขื•ืช (panels) for the roof of the Mishkan. There were ten panels. Five of them were attached to each other, and the other five attached to each other. In addition, they also used the donations to make eleven panels to be used to cover the Mishkan. These eleven were comprised of six panels attached to one another and the remaining five attached to one another. This is hinted to in the name of Hashem. The ' ื™ is 10- that represents the first 10 panels for the roof. The ' ื” is 5 โ€“ representing the fact that these panels were divided 5 and 5. The ' ื• is 6 and the final ' ื” is 5 โ€“ representing the panels that covered the Mishkan that were divided into 6 and 5. With the word ืœืฉืžื™ (referring to the name of Hashem) Rashi is hinting to us what the donations went towards - the panels used for construction of the Mishkan โ€“ which are alluded to in the Name of Hashem.