A Yissachar / Zebulun Partnership in Loving Memory of Yishak ben Simcha A"H & Felicia bat Miriam A"H
Rabbi Eli Mansour

Daf Yomi

Sanhedrin 91A - 91B (12th Cycle Daf Yomi Shiur)

Lectured by Rabbi Eli Mansour

Published
May 16, 2007
Duration
76:34

This transcript was auto-generated and polished for readability. While we aim for accuracy, errors may occur. If you notice a mistake, please click to submit corrections.

The Eddie B Sit edition, an audio series of the Talmud Bavli, specifically the Masechet Sanhedrin, has been sponsored anonymously for the elevation of the soul of Dina Bat Sara. We begin today's Daf, Daf Tzadi Aleph, with a heartfelt prayer for her healing, both of the soul and body, as we recite: "El na Refa na La." Today’s study is also dedicated to the elevation of the soul of Avram Ben Esther, with a prayer that his spirit finds peace in Gan Eden. We are on Daf Tzadi Aleph, Amud Bet, and we will explore profound questions regarding resurrection, as posed by Caesar to Rabban Gamliel.

The Caesar questioned Rabban Gamliel, expressing his belief in the resurrection of the dead but struggling with the mechanics of it. He asked, "If people turn to dust when they die, how can God resurrect them?" In response, the Gemara presents a kal vachomer, a logical inference, from glass. Just as glass, which is shaped by the breath of a craftsman, can be repaired if broken, so too can God restore a human being, created from His breath, after death. If a potter can fix broken glass, certainly, God can resurrect those who bear His spirit.

Rabbi Ami was challenged by a certain Mina, who questioned the feasibility of resurrection from dust. In response, Rabbi Ami provided an analogy of a king instructing his servants to build a palace in a barren land. When they succeeded in doing so, the king asked how they could not build in a place with resources. Rabbi Ami illustrated that if God can create man from mere water, He can certainly resurrect from dust, which is more substantial. This reasoning emphasizes the power of God to create and recreate life.

Rabbi Ami further illustrated his point by referencing a mouse born half flesh and half dirt, which quickly developed into a complete creature. This serves to demonstrate that even in nature, transformation can occur swiftly. He pointed to a type of snail that appears only once every seventy years, suggesting that God can bring about immediate resurrection, contrary to the notion that it takes time. The examples provided underscore the belief in God's omnipotence and His ability to resurrect the dead instantaneously.

In a subsequent exchange, Geviha ben Pesisa, a hunchback, was accused by the Mina of being a rasha, a wicked person, for believing in resurrection. Geviha retorted that if he were to be resurrected, he would take the opportunity to rectify his physical deformity, humorously asserting that he would kick the Mina in retribution. This exchange highlights the interplay between belief and personal identity in the context of resurrection.

As the discussion continued, the Gemara recounted a miraculous event on the twenty-fourth of Nisan, when enemies retreated from Yehudah and Yerushalayim, illustrating divine intervention. This miracle coincided with the Shemittah year, providing sustenance to the Jewish people from the fields left by their fleeing adversaries.

Another encounter involved the children of Yishmael and Keturah, who claimed a share in the land of Canaan. Geviha ben Pesisa again sought permission to debate their claim before Alexander the Great. He argued that the Torah supports the Jewish claim to the land, citing the curse upon Canaan and the servitude of his descendants. His clever reasoning led to the conclusion that even if the land belonged to them, they were effectively slaves, and thus, the land remained with the Jewish people.

The Gemara illustrates further discussions on the resurrection, exploring the nature of the soul and body. Antoninus, a Roman leader, engaged Rabbi with profound questions about the soul's entry into the body and the influence of the yetzer hara, the evil inclination. Rabbi explained that the yetzer hara does not enter until after birth, reflecting on the nature of human temptation and moral responsibility.

Throughout these discussions, the Gemara presents contradictions regarding the nature of resurrection and the afterlife, emphasizing that the dead will be resurrected in their original state and then healed. This duality reflects the complex relationship between physicality and spirituality, underscoring the belief in God's ultimate power to heal and restore.

In conclusion, the teachings in this segment of the Talmud Bavli remind us of the profound mysteries surrounding life, death, and resurrection. They reinforce the belief in divine intervention and the hope for renewal, capturing the essence of faith within the Jewish tradition. As we reflect on these teachings, we are reminded of the importance of our actions in this world and the promise of life beyond it.