A Yissachar / Zebulun Partnership in Loving Memory of Yishak ben Simcha A"H & Felicia bat Miriam A"H
Rabbi Eli Mansour

Daf Yomi

Avodah Zarah 4A - 4B (12th Cycle Daf Yomi Shiur)

Lectured by Rabbi Eli Mansour

Published
July 5, 2007
Duration
69:34

This transcript was auto-generated and polished for readability. While we aim for accuracy, errors may occur. If you notice a mistake, please click to submit corrections.

The Eddie D. Sitt edition presents an audio series of the Talmud Bavli, focusing on Massechet Avodah Zarah, specifically Daf Dalet. Today’s study is dedicated l'ilui nishmat Avraham ben Esther and for a Refuah Shleimah for Miki ben Jamie. We begin on Daf Dalet, amud rishon, nine lines from the top.

The Gemara draws a comparison between the Jewish people and fish, stating, "Just as the fish in the sea, the larger fish swallow the smaller ones," it follows that people behave similarly. If not for the fear of authority, "the stronger would consume the weaker." This indicates that the only deterrent preventing individuals from robbing and stealing from one another is the fear of governmental retribution. The Mishnah states, as Rabbi Hanina Segan ha-Kohanim teaches, "You should pray for the welfare of the government." Without such authority, people would act solely based on their own strength, leading to anarchy.

Rabbi Hanina, who held the position of vice to the priests, remained in this role during a time when the Roman government influenced the appointment of the High Priest. Despite his qualifications, he was never promoted to Kohen Gadol. This raises the question of why he did not ascend to that position. The explanation offered by the commentators suggests that the Roman authorities were corrupt, possibly bribed by others vying for the role. Even in his situation, Rabbi Hanina advocated for praying for the government, emphasizing the importance of prioritizing societal welfare over personal grievances.

The Gemara continues by presenting a contradiction between verses. Rav Henena bar Pappa points out that one verse states, "Shaddai does not act with His measure of strength," while another claims, "Great is our Lord and abundant in strength." The resolution lies in distinguishing between times; during judgment, God restrains His strength to prevent destruction. However, in matters of war against the nations, His strength is unleashed. This distinction emphasizes the different contexts in which divine attributes manifest.

Rabbi Hama bar Rabbi Hanina raises another contradiction regarding God’s anger. One verse states that God does not possess anger, whereas another describes Him as vengeful and possessing anger. The resolution reveals that when dealing with Israel, God does not act with anger; however, in relation to the nations, His wrath is evident. This highlights the unique relationship between God and the Jewish people, where mercy prevails.

Rabbi Chanina bar Pappa offers an alternative explanation, asserting that God does indeed possess anger but refrains from expressing it toward Israel due to His oath not to punish them. This is supported by the verse indicating that had He not sworn, the consequences would have been catastrophic. Thus, God’s restraint serves as a testament to His commitment to Israel.

Rabbi Alexandri teaches that God does not come with claims against His people. When judging the nations, He scrutinizes their actions. The Gemara illustrates this by stating that God will consider the merits of the nations before deciding their fate. If they possess merit, He will redeem them; otherwise, they will face destruction. This reinforces the idea that God’s judgments are not arbitrary but rather rooted in justice.

The discussion transitions to the nature of Jewish observance and the consequences of sin. Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi emphasizes that all commandments performed in this world testify for the Jewish people in the world to come. Each mitzvah creates an angel that advocates for them, affirming their worthiness of reward. The nations will acknowledge this truth, recognizing the merits of the Jewish people.

Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi also reflects on the sin of the golden calf, explaining that it was permitted to occur to provide a pathway for repentance. This incident serves as a reminder that no matter how severe a sin may be, the opportunity for teshuvah exists. The Gemara elaborates that even King David, who committed significant transgressions, serves as an example of the potential for repentance.

Ultimately, the Gemara concludes that both the individual and the community can experience redemption, regardless of their sins. The narrative of the golden calf illustrates that even in moments of failure, there is room for forgiveness and return to God. This message resonates deeply, offering hope and reinforcing the transformative power of repentance within the Jewish faith.